"f86sabre" (f86sabre)
05/01/2017 at 16:53 • Filed to: TV | 5 | 26 |
By the way June is looking at Ward, I think he is about to have a good night. They might even push the beds together. If you don’t recognize the image then get off my lawn.
Jcarr
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 16:57 | 2 |
There’s a beaver joke here somewhere.
Chariotoflove
> Jcarr
05/01/2017 at 16:58 | 0 |
And you just found it.
Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:00 | 1 |
Thanks for the smile and the chuckle.
For Sweden
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:00 | 1 |
Leave It To ReVere
Ash78, voting early and often
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:00 | 6 |
“Ward, please don’t be too hard on The Beaver.”
Chariotoflove
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:02 | 1 |
Aside: I thought the twin beds thing was something the networks did for propriety on TV. Then, I took a tour through an old estate. The master bedroom had twin beds. The guide explained that such was in style back then. Not sure I completely buy that, but it was for this rich couple.
Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:05 | 1 |
They wouldn’t push them together; someone would hop.
WilliamsSW
> Chariotoflove
05/01/2017 at 17:05 | 2 |
Both sets of my grandparents had this setup. They were far from rich- I dunno if it was the norm, but I think it was common-
HammerheadFistpunch
> For Sweden
05/01/2017 at 17:07 | 2 |
2 firefly puns this week? What is this...
WilliamsSW
> Ash78, voting early and often
05/01/2017 at 17:08 | 3 |
Came for this, left satisfied.
But probably not as satisfied as Ward.
HammerheadFistpunch
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:08 | 1 |
for some reason this was also the norm in Norway. Every hotel room had twin beds...all of them. not ideal for a honeymoon.
ttyymmnn
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:08 | 0 |
Ward, something something, Beaver, something something...
Ash78, voting early and often
> WilliamsSW
05/01/2017 at 17:09 | 4 |
Or Eddie Haskell, who is probably filming it from outside their window with a 16mm movie camera to sell it on the black market. #subplot
ttyymmnn
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 17:13 | 3 |
WilliamsSW
> Ash78, voting early and often
05/01/2017 at 17:15 | 2 |
Working title: “Give it to Beaver”
Ash78, voting early and often
> WilliamsSW
05/01/2017 at 17:27 | 4 |
aka “June Buggery”...OK, I’ll leave now.
f86sabre
> HammerheadFistpunch
05/01/2017 at 18:04 | 1 |
It’s a good week.
f86sabre
> Ash78, voting early and often
05/01/2017 at 18:05 | 1 |
That makes a frightening amount of sense.
WilliamsSW
> f86sabre
05/01/2017 at 18:06 | 1 |
It does, doesn’t it?
WilliamsSW
> ttyymmnn
05/01/2017 at 18:10 | 0 |
One of the all time great movies—
ttyymmnn
> WilliamsSW
05/01/2017 at 18:12 | 1 |
Agreed. I wonder how many people failed to notice the constant background noise of propeller engines on the 707.
WilliamsSW
> ttyymmnn
05/01/2017 at 18:49 | 0 |
That was one of the running gags I loved throughout that movie. I vaguely recall seeing some old airplane disaster movie after the fact that had this mixup *unintentionally*. Might have been an old Twilight Zone episode or something, I don’t remember. The funny thing is that after this movie came out, I stumbled on some a couple of movies that were parodied in Airplane!, and some of the scenes started to make more sense. No Highway in the Sky was one, although I don’t think I ever saw Zero Hour.
ttyymmnn
> WilliamsSW
05/01/2017 at 18:52 | 1 |
I had heard that Airplane! was pretty much a shot-for-shot remake of Zero Hour (which I haven’t seen either). You can rent Zero Hour on YouTube for $3.
WilliamsSW
> ttyymmnn
05/01/2017 at 19:55 | 0 |
Funny thing about Airplane! is that I don’t think any of the actors in it had ever done comedy before...
ttyymmnn
> WilliamsSW
05/01/2017 at 19:56 | 0 |
Which probably helped with the deadpan delivery.
wafflesnfalafel
> WilliamsSW
05/01/2017 at 22:15 | 0 |
Ward was more interested in his pipe, slippers and newspaper.